Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 10, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
lint-staged ^15.0.0 -> ^16.0.0 age confidence

Release Notes

lint-staged/lint-staged (lint-staged)

v16.1.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1610 e93578e Thanks @​iiroj! - Try to improve terminating of subprocess of tasks by using SIGKILL, and only calling pidtree when the the main task process has a known pid.

v16.1.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v16.1.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1604 90b37b0 Thanks @​iiroj! - Add another types field to package.json to make even more sure NPM detects that lint-staged includes built-in TypeScript type definitions.

v16.1.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1602 7ea700b Thanks @​dword-design! - Add the types field to package.json to make sure NPM detects lint-staged includes built-in TypeScript type definitions.

v16.1.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1570 a7c0c88 Thanks @​ItsNickBarry! - When using --diff-filter with the D option to include deleted staged files, lint-staged no longer tries to stage the deleted files, unless they're no longer deleted. Previously this caused an error from git add like fatal: pathspec 'deleted-file' did not match any files.

  • 38f942e Thanks @​iiroj! - Removed an extraneous log entry that printed shouldHidePArtiallyStagedFiles to console output.

v16.1.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1565 3686977 Thanks @​iiroj! - Lint-staged now explicitly warns about potential data loss when using --no-stash.

  • #​1571 02299a9 Thanks @​iiroj! - Function tasks (introduced in v16.0.0) only received the staged files matching the conpmnfigured glob, instead of all staged files.

  • #​1563 bc61c74 Thanks @​iiroj! - This version fixes incorrect behavior where unstaged changes were committed when using the --no-stash option. This happened because --no-stash implied --no-hide-partially-staged, meaning unstaged changes to files which also had other staged changes were added to the commit by lint-staged; this is no longer the case.

    The previous (incorrect) behavior can still be achieved by using both options --no-stash --no-hide-partially-staged at the same time.

v16.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • #​1536 e729daa Thanks @​iiroj! - A new flag --no-revert has been introduced for when task modifications should be applied to the index before aborting the commit in case of errors. By default, lint-staged will clear all task modifications and revert to the original state.

  • #​1550 b27fa3f Thanks @​iiroj! - Lint-staged now ignores symlinks and leaves them out from the list of staged files.

Patch Changes

v16.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
  • #​1546 158d15c Thanks @​iiroj! - Processes are spawned using nano-spawn instead of execa. If you are using Node.js scripts as tasks, you might need to explicitly run them with node, especially when using Windows:

    {
      "*.js": "node my-js-linter.js"
    }
  • #​1546 158d15c Thanks @​iiroj! - The --shell flag has been removed and lint-staged no longer supports evaluating commands directly via a shell. To migrate existing commands, you can create a shell script and invoke it instead. Lint-staged will pass matched staged files as a list of arguments, accessible via "$@​":

v15.5.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v15.5.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​1533 5d53534 Thanks @​iiroj! - Improve listing of staged files so that lint-staged doesn't crash when encountering an uninitialized submodule. This should result in less errors like:

    ✖ Failed to get staged files!
    

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team as code owners May 10, 2025 20:28
@renovate renovate bot requested review from kevcube and jamengual May 10, 2025 20:28
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 10, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Join our Discord community for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@cloudpossebot
Copy link
Member

Important

No Changes Were Applied

This Pull Request was merged without using the auto-apply label; therefore, no changes were applied upon merging.

Review the associated issues and, if applicable, tag each with the apply label to apply the changes.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lint-staged-16.x branch from 16f97c0 to 88097ae Compare August 3, 2025 19:25
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lint-staged-16.x branch from 88097ae to 86bab30 Compare August 8, 2025 18:01
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lint-staged-16.x branch from 86bab30 to c70d787 Compare August 19, 2025 11:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lint-staged-16.x branch from c70d787 to 6b01f39 Compare August 31, 2025 11:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant